Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K. Raman Pillai

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 13:59, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

K. Raman Pillai (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG, and WP:POLITICIAN Akhiljaxxn (talk) 12:01, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 12:01, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Akhiljaxxn (talk) 12:01, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:02, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Being president of a political party's local organizing committee in one specific area is not an automatic free pass over WP:NPOL, but the article is not reliably sourced anywhere near well enough to make him notable for it. Notability is not established just because one brief blurb that namechecks his existence in the process of being about something else can be shown to verify that the person exists; it is established by showing numerous sources about him to demonstrate the significance of his work in the role. Bearcat (talk) 15:01, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete being a state level party committee chair is not enough to overcome a paucity of sources.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:24, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per NPOL and WP:MILL. I was a county committeeman for 14 years, and attended the 2000 state committee meeting; no big deal. Bearian (talk) 18:20, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.